Feature Article
  Sign In  | Not a subscriber? Start here (just $4.95!)
Bookmark and Share  
Your FreeView period for this month has expired. For unlimited access to all content on Appellation America please subscribe.

print this article    

Feature Article

Technology in Support of Terroir: Foresight vs Repair Jobs

Although de-alcoholization and micro-oxygenation are now common 'enhancements' in the wine industry -- as this recent trade ad shows -- few, if any, winemakers want to acknowledge they use technology to manipulate their wines.

America (Country Appellation)

Technology in Support of Terroir: Foresight vs Repair Jobs

by Dan Berger
April 20, 2007

APPELLATION AMERICA is drawing some strong reactions to Alan Goldfarb's two-part interview with Clark Smith probing Smith's (Vinovation Inc) technological manipulation of wine.

Editor-at-Large Dan Berger offers a thoughtful argument for using advanced technology in winemaking...but there are provisos.


The arguments for and against the use of technology to improve a wine pose a nearly metaphysical problem. First, how do we define the word “improve?” I think it’s fair to say that it’s still debatable whether a 16.5 percent alcohol wine is rated as a “better” wine than its de-alcoholized counterpart at 14.5 percent.

grapes icon To read the rest of this article (and much else besides),
please become an Appellation America Subscriber.  It's easy and low-cost!


Read one full feature article:

Temecula Valley Struts Its Stuff Temecula Valley
Temecula Valley:
The Southland is on the Rise Again
by Clark Smith   (Aug 24)

Advertisement