Feature Article
  Sign In  | Not a subscriber? Start here (just $4.95!)
Bookmark and Share  
Your FreeView period for this month has expired. For unlimited access to all content on Appellation America please subscribe.

print this article    

Feature Article

Hangtime trials update

Growers may not be demanding more money for loss of grape tonnage due to hang time – at least not yet.

Napa Valley (AVA)

The longer grapes stay on the vine,
the less they cost.*

*But for how long?

by Alan Goldfarb
January 7, 2008

The following discussion took place Nov. 20, 2007 at Honig Winery in the Napa Valley. It was organized exclusively for APPELLATION AMERICA by Ed Weber, the University of California Cooperative Extension Napa County director and farm advisor. Weber passed away Dec. 31, 2007, at the age of 51.


DropCap G36 rape growers and wine producers on long-term contracts have an implied agreement that neither party will suffer monetary hardship because of the loss of grape weight due to hang time. However, as growers and vintners enter into new contracts, consumers may begin to pay more for their wine because growers will insist on being compensated from producers. The consequent rising cost would be passed along to you know who.

grapes icon To read the rest of this article (and much else besides),
please become an Appellation America Subscriber.  It's easy and low-cost!


Read one full feature article:

Temecula Valley Struts Its Stuff Temecula Valley
Temecula Valley:
The Southland is on the Rise Again
by Clark Smith   (Aug 24)

Advertisement