Feature Article
  Sign In
Subscribe to our newsletter
Bookmark and Share  
print this article    

Feature Article

Gallo of Sonoma wants to expand the Russian River Valley AVA

Those against Gallo's push for RRV expansion say its growing conditions are unique and annexing a portion of Sonoma Coast AVA is incongruous.

Russian River Valley (AVA)

Gallo Wants a Russian River
Valley AVA Expansion

Gallo of Sonoma's controversial TTB petition seeks to expand the boundaries of the Russian River Valley AVA. The petition has met considerable opposition from others in the region who believe the proposed addition dilutes the value of the current appellation and benefits only Gallo.

by Dan Berger
October 22, 2008



DropCap Does the nameRussian River Valley” on a bottle of wine carry such prestige it’s worth fighting to rewrite the area’s boundary line?

It does for the E&J Gallo Winery, which has filed a petition with the Treasury Dept.’s Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, seeking to increase the size of the appellation to include its vineyards south and west of Santa Rosa, adjacent to the towns of Cotati and Rohnert Park. (see petition document)

russian-river-ava-map-450b.jpg
The current Russian River Valley AVA boundaries are outlined in green with the proposed area for expansion marked in dotted red. (approximate only)
(map courtesy of RRVW)
The area in question is now legally part of the vast Sonoma Coast AVA, an appellation that’s so large it swings all the way from the southernmost reaches of the county to its northern border with Mendocino. It includes both land hard by the coast, as well as low-lying inland parcels that get wind through the famed Petaluma wine gap.

Despite its easterly location, distant from the county’s coastline, the area proposed for inclusion in Russian River is one of the coolest wine-growing regions in the state. And as such some might be persuaded that it is Russian River-like. However, some of those opposed to the Gallo plan say that the region is actually cooler than Russian River as it is now constituted, and, in any case, is hugely different.

Gallo submitted an extensive analysis to supports its claim that an additional 14,044 acres of land should be included in the Russian River appellation, including climate data showing the cool temperatures at its seven vineyard sites. Each of the vineyards has fewer than 2,800 degree days and thus the area “has the same climate as the current Russian River Valley,” said the petition.

The Case for Expansion

The supporting evidence which Gallo included with its petition appears impressive, and includes research on weather, topography and elevation, soils and geology, and a list of average Brix for some winegrowers in the current viticultural area as well as the proposed expansion.

TTB stated in its report in the Federal Register that it had received more than 50 letters of opposition to the proposed expansion of the Russian River area, most of which argue that “the proposed expansion area falls outside the coastal fog line and thus has a different climate than that of the current viticultural area.”
(see public comments regarding this proposal)

The Russian River Valley Winegrowers, the organization that supports the existing area, is a non-profit group, and as such has decided (after much heated discussion) to take no formal position on the Gallo proposal.

RR-winegrowers-logo-200.jpg“As a non-profit [organization], you have to be very careful about what you do,” said Rod Berglund, owner/wine maker at Joseph Swan Vineyards and a member of the Russian River Valley Winegrowers’ board of directors.

Berglund, who was one of the key forces behind the original RRV boundary as well as its 2005 adjustment, said that individuals in the group may make their personal opinions known, even if they do not reflect the opinion of the group, and he was pleased to go on the record in opposition to the Gallo proposal.

Clearly supportive of the move is Jim Collins, chief viticulturalist for Gallo, who was likewise pleased to support the petition. Asked about the argument that the fog in the proposed appellation addition was somehow different from the fog that invades the existing area, he noted: “I have heard that argument, and I don’t know how would you differentiate [any difference],” he said. “The weather patterns of the area indicate that the fog comes from the same area.

“And frankly, I don’t know how you would tell what differences there could be. Speaking from my experience, I don’t see any difference between that fog and the same kind of fog that we get at our Laguna and MacMurray Ranch properties.”

As for the differences in physical appearance and agricultural divergences seen between the more northerly and southerly districts, Collins said he wasn’t sure that was a particularly germane argument. He added that the Gallo properties are located “not really over the ridge in the Petaluma area,” but where the Petaluma Wind Gap sends its gusts, in more northerly Cotati. And as for the agricultural and timber differences, he added, “I don’t think it’s entirely accurate” to say that what historically grew in the areas was definitively one thing or another.

”I can’t go back in time to see where the fruits and vegetables and redwoods were growing, but the soils are the same.”

Collins note that in 2005, when the Russian River Winegrowers were seeking TTB approval to change their boundary line, “We did approach them at that time, and asked them to include this. But we all agreed it would have held up their approval process, so the board asked us to wait, to avoid the delay.”

“The TTB system is an imperfect system.”

Getting any appellation boundary approved by TTB is always an arduous process, and especially when there are strong and scientifically supported positions both in favor and opposed to the petitions. Moreover, as Berglund said, “The TTB system is an imperfect system.”

When asked what he meant by that remark, Berglund suggested that many TTB specialists have never seen the areas in question. “We’re out here, living here every day, living with and working with these crops,” he said. “Around here the
 Rod Berglund
Rod Berglund, owner and winemaker, Joseph Swan Vineyards
farmers have this wealth of knowledge.” He noted that for an appellation “to meet certain boundaries, it can’t be just some report based on science. It has to be a narrative that they can follow on a USGS topo map. Out here we know that the fog has an impact. But what kind of fog is it? In Burgundy they can follow soil types. We don’t have that luxury; there are so many soil types in this area, so it’s a little more difficult to do.”

He noted that it’s often necessary to show the historical use of the name being used, “but frequently it’s done in such broad brush strokes that it’s hard for people to argue in specific terms. And the reason is, they are not sitting on the ridge tops and walking along the streamside vistas, and seeing what we see, living what we live.”

He was asked if he supported the petition. “I do not. Look, I grew up in Petaluma, and I went to Petaluma High School and I have been in th

READER FEEDBACK: To post your comments on this story, click here

Print this article  |  Email this article  |  More about Russian River Valley  |  More from Dan Berger

Featured Wines

Battaglini Estate Winery 2000 Zinfandel - Twin Pines Ranch Sweet Zin fruit without being over-ripe…spice without being blousy…oak integration without being over the top…a balanced wine.
buy wine 750ml $25.00



Lost Canyon Winery 2006 Pinot Noir - Dutton Ranch - Widdoes Vineyard
buy wine 750ml $42.00

Advertisement




Reader Feedback

Reader Comments... [1]

[1]
Carmine Indindoli , owner/viticulturist
Indindoli Family Vineyards, Russian River Valley, CA
What the hey, let me stick at least my finger out a bit. Thank you, Rod Berglund, for all of your commentary regarding the RRVW (Russian River Valley Winegrowers) organization deciding to not take a position of the Gallo proposal, what a smart wimp! Gina Gallo has been a very prominent supporter of the RRVW as a board member and as a Gallo family member helping "donate" the MacMurray ranch environs for many years to the RRVW org for their big fundraiser weekend. Let's face it, no one wants to bite the hand that feeds it! So what the heck, let Gallo have what they want so they can sell more wine at a higher price; after all, at least it is an American owned winery.

So everyone lay down and be a wimp – it's okay, all for a good reason. All the more reason for me not to want to be a member of RRVW.

To post your comments on this story,
click here

Most Popular